home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- NATION, Page 38COVER STORIESDo-It-Yourself Espionage
-
-
-
- Pssst. Want a briefcase that conceals a tiny video camera?
- How about a mini tape recorder that has a pinhead microphone
- disguised as a tie tack? You don't have to buy this stuff in a
- back alley. Just head over to your local CCS Counter Spy Shop, a
- chain with retail outlets in New York City, Houston, Miami and
- Washington that specializes in high-tech snooping gear.
- According to Tom Felice, sales manager for the New York City
- store, clandestine recording devices are the biggest sellers.
- "The more discreet they are, the more popular," he says. "There
- are a lot of paranoid people out there." Enough for the
- industry to claim total sales last year of $200 million.
-
- Counter Spy is not alone. Other big electronics retail
- chains and smaller mail-order outfits are also bringing elite
- snooping into the mass market. New Jersey-based Edmund
- Scientific sells an electronic microphone for $625 that it
- claims can "pull in voices up to three-quarters of a mile away."
- Life Force Technologies in Colorado sells a briefcase with a
- hidden tape recorder for $1,195. "Invading someone's privacy has
- become as easy as walking into your local electronics store,"
- complains Morton Bromfield, executive director of the American
- Privacy Foundation, based in Wellesley, Mass.
-
- Many of these products can be used in ways that are not
- just obnoxious but illegal. For instance, federal law prohibits
- the taping of telephone conversations unless at least one of
- the parties on the line knows that the conversation is being
- recorded. But so long as retailers remain unaware of -- and
- don't ask about -- the potentially illegal purposes that a
- customer may have in mind, they cannot be held liable. Nine
- years ago, Radio Shack's parent company, Tandy Corp., was sued
- by Elizabeth Flowers, a South Carolina woman whose husband used
- a miniature recording device to secretly tape her phone calls
- after she filed for divorce. Lawyers for Radio Shack
- successfully argued that the company had no responsibility in
- the matter because it did not know what her husband planned to
- do with the device. "There would be nothing left to sell if we
- withdrew all the products that might be used illegally," says
- Robert Miller, a Radio Shack vice president. Besides, he adds,
- with unintended irony, it is not the company's business what
- customers do with the products "in the privacy of their own
- homes." But if the use of such devices becomes widespread, there
- may not be much privacy left at home -- or anywhere else.
-
-
- By Richard Lacayo. Reported by Thomas McCarroll/New York.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-